Context

Every strategic initiative depends on people: those who influence it, those who enable it, and those who are affected by it. The Power–Interest Matrix provides a simple framework for identifying, analyzing, and managing stakeholders based on their level of power (ability to influence outcomes) and interest (degree of concern or engagement with the initiative).

By classifying stakeholders into quadrants, leaders can prioritize communication, anticipate resistance, and design engagement strategies that align influence with purpose.

Core Idea

The Power–Interest Matrix evaluates each stakeholder along two axes:

  • Power: The ability to affect project success, directly or indirectly, through authority, resources, or influence networks.
  • Interest: The level of concern or involvement a stakeholder has in the initiative’s objectives and outcomes.

These axes produce four categories, each calling for a distinct engagement strategy:

QuadrantStakeholder TypeRecommended Strategy
High Power / High InterestKey PlayersEngage and manage closely.
High Power / Low InterestLatentsKeep satisfied.
Low Power / High InterestDefendersKeep informed and consider.
Low Power / Low InterestMarginalsMonitor and inform occasionally.

This classification is dynamic. As projects evolve, stakeholders often move across quadrants, depending on outcomes, visibility, and political context.

Application

The Power–Interest Matrix serves as a strategic diagnostic tool for stakeholder engagement planning.

  1. Identify stakeholders comprehensively: Begin by listing all internal and external actors who can affect or are affected by the initiative (e.g., executives, employees, regulators, customers, partners, suppliers, or communities).
  2. Assess power and interest objectively: Evaluate each stakeholder’s influence (formal authority, access to resources, network position) and their interest (stakes, values, exposure to outcomes). Use evidence and cross-functional consensus to reduce bias.
  3. Plot stakeholders on the matrix: Visualize relationships on a two-axis grid. This visual mapping clarifies where attention and communication efforts should concentrate.
  4. Develop tailored engagement strategies:
    • Key Players: involve early, co-design solutions, and maintain transparent dialogue.
    • Latents: provide executive briefings, highlight strategic benefits, and avoid unnecessary detail.
    • Defenders: use accessible communication channels and invite feedback to maintain motivation.
    • Marginals: track sentiment periodically but invest minimally unless influence grows.
  5. Review and adjust regularly: Conduct periodic reviews to anticipate emerging risks, alliances, or shifts in influence.

Takeaway

The Power–Interest Matrix enables leaders to focus influence where it matters, align diverse interests, and anticipate resistance before it escalates. In environments shaped by competing priorities and limited bandwidth, this framework ensures that every engagement effort serves a clear strategic purpose.